virgil-hilts
Member
ok , thanks for your answer PLATON
Your comments are well stated in this thread, and I think BK has come a very along way in the past few years accomplishing #1.PLATON said:I know the story of an original jacket from the veteran who sold it. He wore the jacket for 10 months only and yet the jacket is faded and all. This proves how the finishes of the time didn't last long.
This effect can be replicated today. In fact BK has already done it in some jackets sold previously.
BK has added the high quality of the leather in the mix, for 2 reasons. 1) to give more value for the price 2) to distinguish from its peers.
I think that evidence has shown that chrome tanned was widely used. Veg tanned leathers are supposed to last longer than chrome so I guess so rotten and cracked A-2 we see on ebay must have been chrome.
I know the story of an original jacket from the veteran who sold it. He wore the jacket for 10 months only and yet the jacket is faded and all. This proves how the finishes of the time didn't last long.
Well saidunclegrumpy said:Your comments are well stated in this thread, and I think BK has come a very along way in the past few years accomplishing #1.PLATON said:I know the story of an original jacket from the veteran who sold it. He wore the jacket for 10 months only and yet the jacket is faded and all. This proves how the finishes of the time didn't last long.
This effect can be replicated today. In fact BK has already done it in some jackets sold previously.
BK has added the high quality of the leather in the mix, for 2 reasons. 1) to give more value for the price 2) to distinguish from its peers.
However, I think as far as #2, it looks more like you have upped the stakes in the same leather arms race. This not a bad thing, as a lot of people (customers) want....maybe demand...the qualities of the finest modern leathers. They don't want their jackets to wear or age, or for that matter really care if they look exactly like the originals actually did.....of which many probably have never seen.
There is a second category of customers, like me for example, who want their jackets to look and wear the exact same way of the originals did. That group may not be as large, but it is still largely unfulfilled in the marketplace.
You keep saying and saying in your marketing material and posts how you are satisfying the needs of both groups to absolute perfection. Which frankly, I don't think is possible with one leather.
IMO the current jacket maker who uncompromisingly nails it for the second category, will be the one who truly distinguishes themselves from their peers. The challenge is to find the holy grail and catch this "elusive ghost".
There is a second category of customers, like me for example, who want their jackets to look and wear the exact same way of the originals did. That group may not be as large, but it is still largely unfulfilled in the marketplace.
You keep saying and saying in your marketing material and posts how you are satisfying the needs of both groups to absolute perfection. Which frankly, I don't think is possible with one leather.
PLATON said:It is possible to make jackets that look and wear the exact same way of originals and I know how. It's going to be costly. So the big question is, can you afford to pay it? Will you be there to pay it when BK releases it?
Even if you will, how many others will be there? Can BK rely on them to at least breakeven? It's too difficult to answer that.
They can be the same thing if accurate to an original jacket.PLATON said:for the price you pay, what do you prefer to get? the cheapo/crapola leather?
or the good stuff?
PLATON said:I think it is OK to wear badges as long as you are not trying to pass for someone you are not and as long as you do not disgrace the uniforms. I wouldn't wear this jacket to go to the pub but I would wear it at Duxford or at similar events and at any other places and where they honor the war heroes.