bseal
Well-Known Member
What color would you say those knits might be...you know, on your computer?
Yes, I believe that a wise man once said "you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink."Hi Dave
Good to see you posting .
Hard to believe that 4 pages later we’re still going around about this isn’t it ?
Cheers
Does anyone know which jacket makers of the M422 thru 7823D made jackets with knits that did not match the color of the jacket (dark brown)
A bit more of the Wizards magic. Rather than duplicate the pics of the Monarch AN-J-3A I've just received from Dave Sheeley here's a collar shot. Love the stitching.
View attachment 144273
View attachment 144275
Credit where it's due Luke, pics of your Monarch AN-J-3A sold this jacket to me. The hide is really characterful and draped beautifully right from the word go. To be honest I've not yet had a chance to wear it properly but I think this is going to be a really nice bit of goat.
Adding this image to the repository. The knit lines look more pronounced as to hint at being a replacement, but since it’s a W&G wanted to add as I’m not sure!Mark,
Yes I agree that it's hard to argue against specifications. That is until you enter the real world.
Please see one of my all original W&G AN-J 3A jackets. One of the jackets I utilized to to derive my interpretation. That jacket can be viewed (# 42) within this same thread.
As seen below with this original AN-J-3A. My reproduction comes from W&G's N288s-35805 contract. Moreover, the jackets from this contract directly contradicts your USN specifications not once but twice.
View attachment 115667
View attachment 115661
View attachment 115663
Note, the stitch work seen in the close up below appears to be all original.
View attachment 115669
View attachment 115665
That jacket seen above is one of the four like W&G AN-J-3A 35805 jackets I have accumulated. Note the factory red knits and horse hide. Albeit I have witnessed same W&G 35805 jackets with brown colored knits that appeared to be factory.
View attachment 115671
Your entire argument reminds me of our conversation regarding that H.L. Block you owned and claimed to be a pre War non labeled M-422. I suppose you convinced yourself your jacket was an M-422 since it did not have the horizontal stitch work along the back of the collar. Exactly like the three builders for the M-422 originally did as per the USN spec
The jacket seen directly below is an original (preWar) size 40 Monarch M-422. There are no horizontal stitch work on the collar as seen on (most) later models.
View attachment 115687
A close up of one of my Monarch M-422 reproductions.Note that there is no horizontal stitch work on the collar its self.
View attachment 115689
In Spite of the fact that Block choose to omit that horizontal stitch work generally seen on most all M-422a, AN & G-1's. Still it goes without saying that those USN jacket specs do have merit. But they are far from being the end all.
Obviously your specifications convinced you again (because as you indicated to me prior that all makers followed USN specifications to a T and you have never seen a deviation) telling you that your Block jacket definitely had to be an M-422. If only because only the M-422 omitted that stitch work and the specifications backed you up.
All in spite of the fact that Block never built a M-422.
Cheers, Dave