mulceber
Moderator
Best bet is Shawn’s tannery in Pakistan…So..are ANY leathers today tanned in the same way as in 1939 ?
Best bet is Shawn’s tannery in Pakistan…So..are ANY leathers today tanned in the same way as in 1939 ?
Yes but at what cost to the environment ?Best bet is Shawn’s tannery in Pakistan…
If you watch old films both documentary or Hollywood of the time the leather always looks supple, shiny, loose and just so cool. I think the whole notion of having to wear those jackets to death before they were "broken in" is bullshit
So..are ANY leathers today tanned in the same way as in 1939 ?
I would guess that somewhere in the world, where environmental concerns and regulations are non-existent or ignored, people are chrome tanning and pigment finishing leather. Pakistan? China? Whoever makes the leather for Lost Worlds here, perhaps?So..are ANY leathers today tanned in the same way as in 1939 ?
Somewhere in Pakistan or Asia or South America- but 5 Star seems to use uniform and thicker stuff. You would have to know what to look for and to have suppleness be a prime consideration. IMOBest bet is Shawn’s tannery in Pakistan…
This is something I have been wondering about. Were some of the hides on old jackets both veg-and chrome-tanned like chromexcel? Perhaps not an either/or proposition?I think its combination tanned.
Not obsessing, just a very interesting aspect of vintage leather jackets which we're all a fan of.And there was me thinking that the difference in tanning processes had been done to death in here before, or did I dream it?
Never mind, I have more important stuff to obsess about.
I don't think the discussion is about the environment, just as it isn't about the animals killed to provide the skin.Yes but at what cost to the environment ?
Na, all high end makers use veg tan as it's a strong likeness to vintage leather, and develops nice character.
But others don't make such bold statements in their marketing. BK do make similar claims with their liberty horsehide.
I have nothing against veg tan, if that's the nearest you can get then that's fine, just don't appreciate the lie.
But it absolutely could be the reason such methods are not being used.I don't think the discussion is about the environment, just as it isn't about the animals killed to provide the skin.