Peter Graham
Well-Known Member
MikeyB-17 said:But I'm just a tightly-wound tool.
Mike. I know who Scott was referring to and it wasn't you.
MikeyB-17 said:But I'm just a tightly-wound tool.
ButteMT61 said:Like Van pointed out earlier, it's "Vintage Leather Jackets".
I think that if you have the need to point out the imperfect zipper, snap or label, you may be a little tightly wound.
Des anyone here buy a Quartermaster thinking it's a stich for stich rep? Of course not. So why bother? Nobody is going to replicate what JC does @ GW for less than 1/2 the price. So is there a need to focus on that? I'm asking its all sincerity. Seems like some just want/need to be tools.
tater said:"ButteMT61 said:Like Van pointed out earlier, it's "Vintage Leather Jackets".
I think that if you have the need to point out the imperfect zipper, snap or label, you may be a little tightly wound.
Des anyone here buy a Quartermaster thinking it's a stich for stich rep? Of course not. So why bother? Nobody is going to replicate what JC does @ GW for less than 1/2 the price. So is there a need to focus on that? I'm asking its all sincerity. Seems like some just want/need to be tools.
Out in the real world, you're unlikely to actually run into anyone who would have the experience to know that anything was off. Here, OTOH, you'd expect a blow by blow of everything that was off. Go to j-aircraft and look at the threads about what color Zeros were actually painted. Pour a large drink, or put a pot of coffee on Meanwhile, and less nerdy viewer of one of their plane models (or animation/game/etc) will just think "wow, that looks awesome!" About what you'd expect from a post here, a new jacket claiming to be a certain contract is going to be looked at under a microscope here. It's a reason to read stuff here, I get to learn a little.
Putting a real contract number on a jacket is in fact asking for comparison to the real thing, as well as competitor's products with the same contract number.
A cost-benefit analysis on if you get your money's worth for ~$625 vs better replicas for $875 or more is perhaps a worthwhile. The key, IMHO, is the overall look of the product, which goes to the pattern, colors, and stitching details.
Roughwear said:or perhaps they chose to ignore it.
Jeff M said:And a merry Christmas to all, with tidings of good will and joy. :|
Peter Graham said:Roughwear said:or perhaps they chose to ignore it.
Such massive arrogance.
Peter Graham said:Roughwear said:or perhaps they chose to ignore it.
Such massive arrogance.
PLATON said:Let's not label people.
This is a forum for jacket discussion. We 'd like to hear the pros and cons of any jacket.
"It looks great on you" is not enough.
Some people take the time to give their opinion for the sake of discussion and sharing of information. This should be appreciated. We critique the jackets, we DON'T critique the people.
If the "thumb down" is not enough as an explanation why a jacket is not good enough, then more information should be sought for.
I guess the majority of the members of this forum is inclined to think that GW jackets are the best (I don't blame them), but thank God, there are members here who although prefer GW are 100% objective in their comments about jackets from other makers. Am I the only one who sees this?
PLATON said:I think all opinions are valuable.
I hear what you say but I am not in the forum for so long so I don't have experience others do.
Also, I don't follow all the threads (Irvin included), so again I can't comment.
Vcruiser said:but it ain't gonna change,Peter.
Peter Graham said:Vcruiser said:but it ain't gonna change,Peter.
Like the NRA Van. . Thanks for the kind remarks. Amongst the arrogance there has always been a core of good guys that make this forum the fun place to visit that it is. Some have dropped away and one has passed away but there are still enough around here to make it worthwhile and long may that last.