MauldinFan
Well-Known Member
I still don't get how anyone here could think how something is valued now would be valued the same for all time.
NONE of the things we all drool over here were considered valuable back in the day. If you could go back in time and tell a WW2 vet that future collectors would spend their rent money on the uniforms they just stopped wearing, they'd want to have you locked in a padded cell!
Anyone who collects old military stuff knows that some of the highest-valued items are the ones which got used up in the past.
For example, WW2 class A jacket are still very common, and why? Because once the GI got home, they went into the closets and the families later couldn't bring themselves to get rid of them. Not so at all for fatigue uniforms or boots. Those got used up and are now quite valuable.
Nobody thought they had panache for many years, either.
NONE of the things we all drool over here were considered valuable back in the day. If you could go back in time and tell a WW2 vet that future collectors would spend their rent money on the uniforms they just stopped wearing, they'd want to have you locked in a padded cell!
You may think this, but you can't assume everyone thinks so. And as for how they're made, that might make them highly collectible years from now if many of them came apart and got thrown away.I don't think so- they're not well made and they're poorly designed. They're still made. They have no "panache".
Anyone who collects old military stuff knows that some of the highest-valued items are the ones which got used up in the past.
For example, WW2 class A jacket are still very common, and why? Because once the GI got home, they went into the closets and the families later couldn't bring themselves to get rid of them. Not so at all for fatigue uniforms or boots. Those got used up and are now quite valuable.
Nobody thought they had panache for many years, either.