• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Help with some info please - N-2A MIL-J-6278

Skeptic

New Member
I thrifted this a couple years ago now. I am not a collector.. I sort of bought it as a flip but as it hasn't sold I am think of wearing it since its my size anyway... is that sacrilege here? :D

Its in incredible shape (imo) but the fur on the hood is very very rough.. almost to the point that it sort of sticks you if you wear it.

Is that normal? Can it be softened/conditioned? How should it be cared for to maintain it? With the mix of natural and synthetic materials I don't want to screw it up. I've read its wolf or coyote? Any way to know for sure?

Any info is appreciated - The more the better as I am a curious type. Sure is nice to have groups of informed people to query :)

Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7486.jpg
    IMG_7486.jpg
    113.4 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG_7487.jpg
    IMG_7487.jpg
    121.3 KB · Views: 35
  • IMG_7488.jpg
    IMG_7488.jpg
    114.3 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG_7489.jpg
    IMG_7489.jpg
    180.4 KB · Views: 32
  • IMG_7490.jpg
    IMG_7490.jpg
    16.7 KB · Views: 31
  • IMG_7491.jpg
    IMG_7491.jpg
    148.1 KB · Views: 23
  • IMG_7492.jpg
    IMG_7492.jpg
    180 KB · Views: 23
  • IMG_7493.jpg
    IMG_7493.jpg
    66.5 KB · Views: 30

ZuZu

Well-Known Member
It's a 50s N-2A in a very desirable big size! Used in the Korean war- in good shape a true collector's item. I'm almost certain the fur is wolf's fur- it's spiky like that- don't mess with it. (I think the theory was that it helped keep out the wind and snow when closed up). Beautiful color- much cooler than Sage IMO.
 

Dany McDonald

Well-Known Member
Hi Skeptic,

Nice N-2A and in good shape. It's a 1952 (fiscal year) made jacket. The fur is synthetic. The ones with coyote fur are more desirable hence why you may have a hard time flipping. They are not that ''rare'' in that size. Remember they are design to be used in a cockpit, so they are a bit short in the upper body. The hood is also over sized and bulky. I find them very desirable and fun to wear, but not everyone does. The A series tend to be a bit bulkier than the later B serie, at least mine are.

I personally think that the N-3 ''parka'' are easier to wear in an everyday setting.

HTH!

D
 

ZuZu

Well-Known Member
Hi Skeptic,

Nice N-2A and in good shape. It's a 1952 (fiscal year) made jacket. The fur is synthetic. The ones with coyote fur are more desirable hence why you may have a hard time flipping. They are not that ''rare'' in that size. Remember they are design to be used in a cockpit, so they are a bit short in the upper body. The hood is also over sized. I find them very desirable and fun to wear, but not everyone does. The A series tend to be a bit bulkier than the later B serie, at least mine are.

I personally think that the N-3 ''parka'' are easier to wear in an everyday setting.

HTH!

D
What makes you think that long fur is synthetic? In the 50S? I had this same coat with the same fur and I thought you could see the leather base of the fur. It's definitely odd and specific to those blue jackets but I do think it's wolf. I don't think the fur trim was synthetic 'til the 70s on N-2Bs and N-3Bs. Am I wrong? If so I'll stand corrected!

Also- why was the 50s synthetic so cool and realistic looking and the 70s so fake looking ugly? Interesting...
 
Last edited:

Skeptic

New Member
Hi Skeptic,

Nice N-2A and in good shape. It's a 1952 (fiscal year) made jacket. The fur is synthetic. The ones with coyote fur are more desirable hence why you may have a hard time flipping. They are not that ''rare'' in that size. Remember they are design to be used in a cockpit, so they are a bit short in the upper body. The hood is also over sized and bulky. I find them very desirable and fun to wear, but not everyone does. The A series tend to be a bit bulkier than the later B serie, at least mine are.

I personally think that the N-3 ''parka'' are easier to wear in an everyday setting.

HTH!

D
Wow thanks for the info! Is there any significance to one maker over another? It sounds like there were more than 1 manufacturer. Any resource to decode the rest of the tag to any worthwhile information?
Regarding cleaning, I was mostly wondering about softening up the fur. I will have to get a close look at it... magnified perhaps. I really get the feeling its natural and not synthetic but maybe that's something you can tell from the maker on the tag? Either way its not comfortable :D It is short waisted like you say and I did see they made a parka style as well. I would prefer that probably for the Wisconsin winters. I've worn it a few times in deep winter and its very, very warm.

Again thanks everyone for chipping in info. Pretty cool that these jackets were so well made that we have survivors over 70 years later!
 

Dany McDonald

Well-Known Member
Thare a many differences within a same type or specification. You probably noticed that the hardware used and some colors variation from one manufacturer to another are found on the hood fur, the liner etc.
Why are some N-2A are more desirable than other? First contract awarded, the coyote fur (beautiful on earlier contract by the way) and rarity. Some have been modify to better serve the ground crews with reflective stripes and some are patched, etc...

The tag codes are purely administrative, nothing related to the fabric or components.

The ugly black thing is definitely not wolf or badger like some say. The term synthetic trim fur has been used in Full Gear by Aota Mituhiro and other japanese flight jackets books.


HTH!

D
 
Last edited:

ZuZu

Well-Known Member
Thare a many differences within a same type or specification. You probably noticed that the hardware used and some colors variation from one manufacturer to another are found on the hood fur, the liner etc.
Why are some N-3A are more desirable than other? First contract awarded, the coyote fur (beautiful on earlier contract by the way) and rarity. Some have been modify to better serve the ground crews with reflective stripes and some are patched, etc...

The tag codes are purely administrative, nothing related to the fabric or components.

The ugly black thing is definitely not wolf or badger like some say. The term synthetic trim fur has been used in Full Gear by Aota Mituhiro and other japanese flight jackets books.


HTH!

D
Cool- thanks! I had one and I really liked the ugly blackish blue fur. Still not 100% sure if the only reference is the Japanese books but they're probably right. It's also called "synthetic badger fur" in an old thread on this forum. The way that fur replicated soft underfur and bristly guard hairs was uncanny. It was definitely a special look.
 

bn1966

Well-Known Member
I have one of these (N-2A) & on purchase had it sympathetically cleaned by a dry cleaner here in the UK who specialised in ‘vintage’ military clothing and bridal wear. Absolutely love the SAC blue contrasting with the hood ruff. I wear it on the odd occasion it’s cold enough in the south west part of the UK (still T shirt weather-during the day). Had an N-3A but found it just too hot even in the depths of our Fall / Winter, N-2A is toasty but not roasty. Took me a while to find a good one but defo one of my favourite flight nylons.
 

Dany McDonald

Well-Known Member
This is the fake thing on my C.H. Masland & Sons N-3A, I can't imagine it walked the earth even on this Halloween evening...;)


1730408489258.png
 
Top