ThanksI cant say... !?
The jacket appears to be an original for sure, cant say about the patches.
You could ask Dave @Maverickson - he is super knowledgeable about all things USN jackets.
ThanksI cant say... !?
The jacket appears to be an original for sure, cant say about the patches.
You could ask Dave @Maverickson - he is super knowledgeable about all things USN jackets.
@Chandler here another one i found on the web
Yeah, there's confusion somewhere, because you get two different initials and spellings, but the patch crest looks identical.
Unfortunately that didn’t help ... I had seen a jacket with a perforated wind flap like this one time years ago and the explanation that was offered about why it looked like that was that : When the jacket was “DXed” a military term for non serviceable or declared as a item to be considered for sale to the surplus military clothing market , the wind flap would be perforated similar to what you have on your jacket . I don’t know that to be factual and I’ve never seen that information printed anywhere. I simply heard it from another collector at a military show .
very confusing indeed.I see that patch in connection with a lot of Avirex multi-patch G-1s. Very curious, especially considering you can find info on a real ship with such a similar name.
Thanks for your info, very appreciated.Unfortunately that didn’t help ... I had seen a jacket with a perforated wind flap like this one time years ago and the explanation that was offered about why it looked like that was that : When the jacket was “DXed” a military term for non serviceable or declared as a item to be considered for sale to the surplus military clothing market , the wind flap would be perforated similar to what you have on your jacket . I don’t know that to be factual and I’ve never seen that information printed anywhere. I simply heard it from another collector at a military show .
that patch keeps me pondering all night. LOLJust very curious.
The Destroyer Messenger Bag Z99G016
Shop The Destroyer Messenger Bag made of cotton at Cockpit USA - a brand built on the firm foundations of an affinity for leather, aviation and an all-American heritage since 1975.cockpitusa.com
The solid news is that your jacket is legit, if not "decommissioned," as Burt points out.that patch keeps me pondering all night. LOL
I saw that too and wondered if it was a ship mentioned in the film, but could find no reference.A know very little on this subject however I have watched top gun a lot and I remember the patch was popular on jackets post film release in the 80s
Baz
I didn't think you had, your presumptions seem well-based on available information....and did not mean to offend
An answer to the patch could be one these reproduction patches from the 80's jackets married to an original jacket
That's very interesting thanks for your infothe additional windflap punch looks like "VS31" which was an anti-submarine squadron. also, the number "24" could also indicate squadron pool jackets which were issued to people on flight orders but who had not been issued a personal jacket. some USMC squadrons spray painted the squadron and jacket numbers on the back of pool jackets to reduce pilferage by easily identifying the jacket from the outside. the "AMO" on the name tag usually indicates Aircraft Maintenance Officer, but i've never seen this superimposed over wings. i believe the jacket is real and used by VS 31 as a pool jacket. the squadron patch and name tag are a bit more suspect to me. IMHO
you can add to windflap letters with a standard leather hole punch. some USMC fliers amended the "USN" on their jackets to "USMC" this way.
I sow them on instagram too.A know very little on this subject however I have watched top gun a lot and I remember the patch was popular on jackets post film release in the 80sView attachment 55312
Baz
@Phrog Driver Thanks you. I'm sort of agreed with you on the patch that its perhaps add on later. WIth the name tag looks authentic too me but I'm not the expert. all comments and suggestions are welcome.Patches are weird, not sure what is going on there. The ships patch with misspelled name is a puzzle. Also that particular ship being strictly a surface unit, would not have any kind of aviation officer assigned unless there was a helicopter detachment embarked (and then everybody would be wearing their squadron patch). Also, a detachment would have a LT or a CWO as the AMO as well, not a LCDR. Designated AMO's are usually prior enlisted, non-aircrew Limited Duty Officers (cannot hold command at sea), and most all their billets are in squadrons or wings or intermediate maintenance departments ashore and afloat. So basically nothing about the jacket patches make sense, but the jacket itself is certainly legit from what I can see and you should enjoy it as such.