John Lever
Moderator
He changed the description to include works for Eastman Leather
I spoke to Dizzie and he knew nothing about it......
I spoke to Dizzie and he knew nothing about it......
Having looked at the photos several times I think you are right John. The photo showing the pocket reveals a pale patch above the pocket.My guess is that it got damaged/stained and someone had tried to cover it up by using wax and other colourants
Well spotted regarding the tins!, I bet you are spot on.I wonder if the empty tins of brown stuff on the windowsill bottom right in the 4th pic have anything to do with it?
I still like the look of it, looks a more convincing ageing job than most I’ve seen-the leather bits don’t look brand new like they usually do-new leather and aged sheepskin looks daft. Appears to have sold.
Oops! missing on the latest photos…Can it be that the seller is a member here at least reading all this?… IMO…?Tins are Meltonian shoe cream
100% agree…I dont think any of the comments in this thread ( mine included) are posted with any malice, but whether or not the seller is aware of the true history of the jacket is questionable?.
And in view of the asking price I personally think that the knowledge of members (myself excluded) is important and worthy of taking on board before any member of the forum less informed might part with hard earned cash without realising what they have bought.
Further more if the vendor is a member here maybe they should enlighten us all and solve the mystery ?.
There is a likelihood that the finish might lighten and fade over the years. Not to the extent of Nick's SFAD which I think has the perfect amount of consistent wear and 'patina' (it is nicer than saying grubbiness').Yes, that is what it looks like. I used to own an Eastman SFAD and it had the 4 panel back unlike the stock B3.
Looks like it was redyed and may have shrunk some in the process. Not a bad job in my personal opinion, but to each his own.