And about Charles and HPA, I seriously doubt the guy is going to dump on jackets he's going to be selling. Don't want to buy from him, that's cool. Thing is, it's starting to look like a witch hunt here and on TFL.
I think he gets what the Company gives him, and takes it for gospel to an extent and after all, he's selling stuff.
SNIP He's left another response to my question this morning that's worthy of even the most skilled career politician. Utter rambling nonsense that doesn't even answer my original question SNIP I'm becoming increasingly convinced the man is just making stuff up out of thin air to pad out his descriptions. SNIP.[/QUOTE said:I've been looking forward to his FL reply, I hadn't expected it quite this soon but...............
I have to agree with ML, but this one sentance floored me..........
"I have never seen any combat jacket that had 100% of its knit parts replaced during its initial operational life vs. its postwar life"
Without wishing to brag I may well have replaced more sets of knit than anyone else in the game over the last 45 years, many of these re-furbs involved replacing previous replacement knits. Unless these were obviously post war parts I've have no idea whatsoever how anyone could date exactly when a jacket first had it's knits replaced. Perhaps someone could enlighten me?
Most of us have seen recoats with replacement knits, when were these done?
I thought this too initially, but I'm becoming increasingly convinced the man is just making stuff up out of thin air to pad out his descriptions. After all, what's to stop him? He's the sole North American distributor, and he can claim to have heard whatever he likes from Toyo directly. It's not like anyone can just ring up and check. He still appears to be the only man in human history who has seen and handled a genuine red knit B-10, after all. The fact he turns oddly sheepish and very defensive whenever anyone has the audacity to ask about the provenance of a jacket makes me increasingly convinced this is the case.
I just read Charles's comment over there now. Funny how he now says he never did claim the red MA-1 was the same jacket when the blurb at the HPA site and what he's posted over there says otherwise.
Yeah, but then you can't charge $500 for the privilege...it becomes a $250 jacket right there.It certainly is curious, isn't it. If he'd stated that it was an original Buzz designed MA-1 based on those worn by Northrop test pilots, then there would be no issue. I don't think people would have a problem with that - see the William Gibson jackets, for instance, which are pure fantasy but have a special appeal because of that very fact.
He seems to have a problem when choosing words in general. Take this from the blurb about that red jacket, which apparently has a "copy of a commercial-style label in the neck area." This inherently makes no sense. It's impossible to have an authentic copy of something which is completely made up to begin with. It's pure blabber.
He seems to have a problem when choosing words in general. Take this from the blurb about that red jacket, which apparently has a "copy of a commercial-style label in the neck area." This inherently makes no sense. It's impossible to have an authentic copy of something which is completely made up to begin with. It's pure blabber.
@Monsoon - I still love that red jacket!