Dr H
Well-Known Member
A quick comparison of the two Type A-1 jackets that I have from GW (the early 20s test jacket) and ELC (a reissue .50 Cal A-1 based on the original in Gary Eastman's collection).
Image of both Type A-1 jackets buttoned (GW on the left, ELC on the right).
Similar view of the rear of the jackets.
Some significant differences in the patterns (notably the buttons versus snaps, and the pocket sizes, flaps and positioning).
The GW sleeves are usually three-piece, inset/rotated with triple stitched raw seams; ELC have two-piece, in line, rolled seams.
GW has paler/mustard lining, double stitched hanger loop, compared with ELC darker brown lining.
Different heights in collar knit apparent (and treatment of box stitching to hanger loop).
Fully buttoned front and rear.
In my opinion, the only weakness of the ELC pattern is in the collar knit height, which hinders the collar from falling properly. In contrast, the depth and thickness of the GW collar makes this neater in use.
It's my intention to replace the current collar on the .50 cal with a pattern based on the GW, but using the ELC knit material. Bit of a project, but ultimately very worthwhile as it'll make such an improvement to the lay of the collar and the overall appearance of the jacket.
The difference in the hides is remarkable. The GW cape is wearing quickly at friction points, becoming paler and flattening grain. The .50cal simply looks very old and worn right out of the box.
The patterns offer a great contrast - I'm using the GW for work now that it's a little warmer. It's dressier and there's a little more room for a little layering. The ELC is more casual and is grand with jeans in the evening.
Image of both Type A-1 jackets buttoned (GW on the left, ELC on the right).
Similar view of the rear of the jackets.
Some significant differences in the patterns (notably the buttons versus snaps, and the pocket sizes, flaps and positioning).
The GW sleeves are usually three-piece, inset/rotated with triple stitched raw seams; ELC have two-piece, in line, rolled seams.
GW has paler/mustard lining, double stitched hanger loop, compared with ELC darker brown lining.
Different heights in collar knit apparent (and treatment of box stitching to hanger loop).
Fully buttoned front and rear.
In my opinion, the only weakness of the ELC pattern is in the collar knit height, which hinders the collar from falling properly. In contrast, the depth and thickness of the GW collar makes this neater in use.
It's my intention to replace the current collar on the .50 cal with a pattern based on the GW, but using the ELC knit material. Bit of a project, but ultimately very worthwhile as it'll make such an improvement to the lay of the collar and the overall appearance of the jacket.
The difference in the hides is remarkable. The GW cape is wearing quickly at friction points, becoming paler and flattening grain. The .50cal simply looks very old and worn right out of the box.
The patterns offer a great contrast - I'm using the GW for work now that it's a little warmer. It's dressier and there's a little more room for a little layering. The ELC is more casual and is grand with jeans in the evening.