I had to decide whether to post this here or in the "wear or not to wear thread", as this one has been my go to wearer original g-1 for many years. it is a 1951 [first star g-1 contract] star, and as can be seen in super condition in and out. when the jacket came to me some 20 years ago, I thought that the knit elements were replaced, but nope,,they are original. I have see a few original g-1s with the red russet knits in the past, but this one is the only one with the red russet knits that I have ever had in hand. by the looks of it, I have determined that the knits were originally brown, and faded to the reddish color, due to a dying glitch when they were made. the coin attached to the puller came as seen. I would say that the jacket is slightly heavier than my other g-1s.View attachment 55914
good question. both are made to the highest quality, with the star slightly heavier. also, the star is 1/2"-3/4" longer in the body and sleeves. though it is hard to tell, due to the futon, the pritzker collar lobes are slightly longer and pointier, and, the pocket flaps are a little more beveled on the star, then the pritzker. . btw, upon reconsidering, I've decided to keep the pritzker, as it is damn near irreplaceable, and fits perfectly. hell, if I sold the pritzker, I would only spend the dough on loose women, drugs, and booze, and the rest I would just piss away.
don't mean to be misleading. its a wearer alrighty, but by no means every day. I have pulled it from the pile just recently, not having worn it for the last year or so. that written, I used to wear it about 50 or so times a year, weather permitting.
WeiAh, I see. Thanks for clarifying that. I had wanted to know because I had made a promise to myself that I would not baby and would actually wear my original if I were to buy it.
If I'm being honest, I've been wearing my original for a bit now and still have yet to get 'comfortable' in it.
I hope to one day be at a point where, without abusing the jacket, I can slip it on like a second skin or wear it and feel like I'm saying hello to an old friend.
Is it odd that I think of it like a living animal? That I have yet to earn its trust. That I have to spend more quality time with it for it to 'trust' me?
Wow, I am overthinking this lol
That is a gorgeous colour..View attachment 64060Not mine, but my god! Just look at that organically faded golden mouton. I’ve the exact same cut of collar on my Brill, so I certainly know that’s the original mouton! It looks fluffy too! How the hell can I get my collars to do that?!
My guess is the cotton element is the fabric base to which the Dynel fur is attached.Turns out Dynel collars aren't 100% Dynel; rather, 80% Dynel, 20% cotton.
Didn't know they started using Cowhide in later D models either! I'd thought only E models were Cattlehide...
View attachment 59301
WeiView attachment 64060Not mine, but my god! Just look at that organically faded golden mouton. I’ve the exact same cut of collar on my Brill, so I certainly know that’s the original mouton! It looks fluffy too! How the hell can I get my collars to do that?!
I’d be happy to Lorenzol. Thanks for the kind words . Give me a little while to take some photos and I’ll post them in this thread .What a Beauty, Burt. Would you care to shows a picture or tow of the complete jacket, please?
Here ya go Lorenzol.What a Beauty, Burt. Would you care to shows a picture or tow of the complete jacket, please?
Wei,
In answer to your question about "How the hell do I get my mouton to do that?", I took a slicker brush (dog brush) to the shearling collar of my B-3 repro and it ended up looking new/unworn with no damage or pulled fur. It does not work on the Dynel collars.
P.S. When did the collar on the G-1 become more rounded? Korean War era G-1's seem to have the same "pointed" style collars as my M-422A, but my Vietnam collar is rounded. When that happen?