mulceber
Moderator
Introduction:
One of the first things that any newbie stumbling onto vintageleatherjackets.org (VLJ) and looking to buy a flight jacket learns (besides “it costs how much?!”) is that there was not one A-2 jacket, but countless different combinations of patterns, leathers, zippers, thread and knit colors that were used during the decade-plus that the A-2 jacket was standard flying equipment for America’s nascent Air Force.For those who don’t quietly back out the proverbial door and resolve that maybe they should explore other hobbies, the sheer variety of details that can be found on these contracts poses an on-going challenge, and finding good sources of information can be a struggle. Most reproduction manufacturers provide some details about the contracts they copy in order to give prospective buyers an appreciation for their wares, but these details only pertain to the contracts a given manufacturer reproduces, and the quality of information is limited by how much the manufacturer himself knows or wants to share. Reference books are more comprehensive and generally better, but these are often out of print and can sometimes represent a considerable investment over-and-above the cost of the jackets themselves. They also may contain information that is out of date.
Our aim in this thread is to bring together as much reliable information as possible about the various A-2 jacket contracts manufactured for the U.S. military between 1930 and 1943. Taking up a project like this is daunting, both because the A-2 jacket is the bread and butter of folks like us, but also because the topic has already been tackled by a very heavy hitter, Gary Eastman. Eastman’s A-2 Guide, published in 2012, is one of the top one or two books available in this hobby, and anyone who has an opportunity to buy a copy should do it, no questions asked. Eastman’s book was a great leap forward in our knowledge about the contract data, with several of the “no-name” contracts being identified for the first time in the pages of his book. He also proved that cowhide was indeed used in A-2 jackets. This question was wracking the hobby at the time, and it had started several very bitter fights that today seem rather silly. Eastman’s book is also very readable and makes its points in a clear and sensible way.
That said, in the last decade there have been several exciting new discoveries, and the internet has the potential to give us access to far more jackets than were accessible when Eastman first published his book. Working from the solid foundations in Eastman’s A-2 Guide, we hope to build on its successes, address some questions that it didn’t, and carry the conversation forward.
For all that Eastman is a very tough act to follow, I personally am reassured because I had some great people around me who - I hope - have kept me from messing this up. Phil (@Lord Flashheart) read through this thread more than once and pointed out a number of areas where I was unclear, made unwarranted assumptions, or where more needed to be said. And the conclusion is his baby. Jeff Thurston (@ZuZu) made a number of great suggestions to improve the identification guide, and I knew I could count on him to call BS if I started regurgitating rumor and hearsay. VLJ member @33-1729 had the A-2 specification 94-030 documents declassified from the National Archives (1-Aug-2017) and this identified two new contracts as well as several errors that were contained on a "Type Designation Sheet" (TDS) used by many reference books, among many other findings. The information at his fingertips, and the knowledge he brings to this project are both astonishing. And John Chapman has kindly agreed to look over our findings when he can spare a moment from his busy career making astonishing reproductions and offer feedback and ideas to improve. This thread would be amateurish without all their contributions.
Finally, I would like to make a request of you who are reading this thread. The VLJ is a wealth of information and knowledge, and while none of us has the experience of a John Chapman or a Gary Eastman, together we bring quite a lot of knowledge and experience to bear on this topic. We have worked hard to place in this document only information that we could support with physical evidence – specification documents, original jacket inspections, contract documents, official correspondence, etc. Speculation has been kept to a bare minimum, and is clearly noted as such. Nevertheless, there are likely still some omissions, particularly in such areas as the zipper data and the identification guide. If you see any such mistakes, please comment, with supporting evidence, so we may correct it. The intention is to make the conversation on this board even better informed than it already is. So I guess my final “thank you”, in advance, is to the readers who will make this thread better.
As in our Navy Jacket thread, “A Better Fighting Garment”, we have opted to create a separate thread for comments and reactions, so that this thread can remain a focused sticky. You can find the link here.