airfrogusmc
Well-Known Member
My 55s are US made and also extremely dark. Probably the darkest of all the LVCs I have and I have a few pairs. Some of the coolest denim I have is the stuff thats on my 333s and my 209 coveralls.
Heres a pair of US made 47s. The cut of the 47s is to trim as compared to originals.Cobblers161 said:Try this http://item.rakuten.co.jp/hinoya/c/0000000178/ Good ole Hinoya.
Pretty much the same price depending on the exchange rate. I had a pair of 47's from Japan and they looked great, a deeper indigo and beautiful fading.
Just washed some '33's after a couple of months and they're cracking jeans, I'm suprised how narrow they are, it's not a complaint I just expected a looser cut, as a result I love 'em.
stanier said:Airfrog, you touch on a very good point there; how does the cut of Japanese LVC's compare with US made LVC's? I know my 44's (Japan LVC) are very high waisted, certainly compared to my US 37's though I can't compare to US made 44's.
I'm satisfied with the US made 47's I have, but I wish LVC would make a 1955 cut jean with leather patch and single sided red tab, which I believe would make them a 1951 - 1953 model? (The zip on 54's isn't my cup of tea)
Now if they made those, with meticulous attention to detail, in a US (Levis owned) facility, with US workers from US sourced "weave facsimile" denim I, for one, would pay considerably more than the current sort of prices for a pair.
In fact the same criteria applied to any vintage Levis repro (prior to 1955 (inclusive)) would be tempting my wallet on a regular basis!
Grant said:Hi Stanier,
I don't own any of the current US LVC '47's but compared to ones from over five years ago the LVC Japan '47's are cut larger in the waist and fuller through the seat and legs. The denim is also a darker indigo and heftier in weight than the US made '47's. All in all the US made '47's have a more modern trim fit compared to the LVC Japan. I really dig them but afraid I would they would never shrink down to my waist size... major bummer.