This size 2 would be ideal for the smaller sized member of the forum.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/RCAF-RAF-Irvin-Fl ... 2c5407db86
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/RCAF-RAF-Irvin-Fl ... 2c5407db86
Where did you find that ? It's wildly inaccurate. Trust me, a size 2 is very small. I take a size 4 and I can fit into a small L-2B.tamoko said:Not very small, just short.
Size 1 is short small
Size 2 is short medium
Size 3 is short large
Size 4 regular small
Size 5 regular medium
Size 6 regular large
Size 7 long small
Size 8 long medium
Size 9 long large
That Irvin size guide - if correct - is interesting, in that say a Size 7 would be smaller than a size 3? Maybe our resident Irvin expert can confirm it. If so, it sounds like an 8 might be just right for me...approx 38 chest but long body.
rich said:That Irvin size guide - if correct - is interesting, in that say a Size 7 would be smaller than a size 3? Maybe our resident Irvin expert can confirm it. If so, it sounds like an 8 might be just right for me...approx 38 chest but long body.
No Miles, I don't know where tamoko got this size chart from but it's not right, Peter is correct. Even going by the information on the label is misleading for a good fit because the jackets come up larger than indicated. I'm a 42 chest, but a size 5 fits me well, a size 6 is OK but a little on the big side. If you ever intend buying an original, it would be best to get the exact dimensions and never go by the label. I'm waiting for Roughwear to put all that into English now.............
Yes, that's right but it doesn't make a size 2 short medium. Size 2 is roughly 34" chest. End of story. Your chart does not relate to Irvin jackets. They are all short !!tamoko said:"I take a size 4 and I can fit into a small L-2B."
Right, like 4 = S Reg.
rich said:No Miles, I don't know where tamoko got this size chart from but it's not right, Peter is correct. Even going by the information on the label is misleading for a good fit because the jackets come up larger than indicated. I'm a 42 chest, but a size 5 fits me well, a size 6 is OK but a little on the big side. If you ever intend buying an original, it would be best to get the exact dimensions and never go by the label. I'm waiting for Roughwear to put all that into English now.............
Thank you Andrew !Roughwear said:A size 3 was certainly much smaller than a size 7!
Yes, all a bit confusing. Actually, I already have an original Irvin. No label, so no idea what size it is. Just need to match up the sleeve zippers and I'll be perfectly happy with it...maybe a bit big, but Irvins look fine whether fitted or oversized. As you say, they come up larger because they were intended to be worn over the unform, which ups them by one or maybe even two sizes.