Micawber
Well-Known Member
I don't like it, either -- granted, I realize doing research can be challenging. I once sought information on a WWII vet. only to learn that a fire in 1972 at the National Archives location in St. Louis, Mo., (hope I recall the year correctly) destroyed many records and information has been forever lost. So with dim history from federal sources ... that leads to the web site research route.
Same for auctioneers, I suppose. I've seen some who describe listings via cutting and pasting an entire squadron history from other sites, but then go scant on details of what they're selling. I've never been a fan of that technique.
Then again, I've seen some listings prepared by auctioneers who've painstakingly attempted to validate a jacket's authenticity via a vet's history only to post inaccurate information because details were sourced from other web sites -- that were also wrong.
Provenance can be tricky; that's why I like VLJ.
This is my .02 (a response) to the June 5 posts on page 4 by Jorgeenriequeaguilera and Chandler. I thought it would quote those posts ... guess I was wrong.
Aye, it's frustrating to discover that a lot of service records were lost in that fire. Sometimes you are lucky and the records of this or that particular individual survived but it's often pot luck.