• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Well worn B-10's

Grant

Well-Known Member
B-10-1.jpg
 

deand

Active Member
And the A-1. That bakelite in the visor..., well,... I can't see doing that to my repro to repro a vintage look. I guess there are limits on how close one can get to recreating how it really was worn.









dean
 

deeb7

Gone, but not forgotten.
deand said:
And the A-1. That bakelite in the visor..., well,... I can't see doing that to my repro ...

Oh, they really were bakelite ... I was thinking that was something peculiar to MASH. :oops:
 

deand

Active Member
deeb7 said:
deand said:
And the A-1. That bakelite in the visor..., well,... I can't see doing that to my repro ...

Oh, they really were bakelite ... I was thinking that was something peculiar to MASH. :oops:

You raise an excellent point, David. I am basing my statement on the MASH site, which claims they were bakelite, and they show a photo of the insert, a rich brown thing that must be the bakelite material. I really have no other information on it. The repro I have has a visor insert that I imagine mimics bakelite, but is probably a modern plastic equivalent.




dean
 

dmar836

Well-Known Member
The presumably original B-1 I have has a stiff visor that I don't wish to flex too far. Once it cracks, it would never look right again. You never really even see them formed in period pics, do you?
Dave
 

Dr H

Well-Known Member
If it really is period bakelite (phenol-formaldehyde resin) then it would be inadvisable to put it under any real flexural stress as it'll crack dramatically and fail along the crease, especially if it has been aged.
 

deand

Active Member
I called it an "A-1"! Idiot! You know I meant B-1. If bakelite was the stuff, shaping must have involved heat, but would there really be the right amount of flexibilty even then? I agree with Dr. H and you, Dave, I've always thought bakelite was very brittle, adise from being antique.







dean
 

Dr H

Well-Known Member
Thermosets are my business - if Bakelite it would have been moulded with heat/pressure in one shot, rather than shaped as with a thermoplastic.
 

deand

Active Member
Dr H said:
Thermosets are my business - if Bakelite it would have been moulded with heat/pressure in one shot, rather than shaped as with a thermoplastic.


Thank you for that bit of info. Makes one really wonder if it was bakelite, and why they would use it, when there were easier materials to use.







dean
 

Dr H

Well-Known Member
Well there were plenty of synthetic and semi-synthetic polymers around at the time, many better suited than Bakelite. Fine for moulded articles - casings, etc., but poor in thin section. Need to look into it a little more...
 

Grant

Well-Known Member
I think this photo's been posted here before but here's another photo from the same photographer.

Tusk.jpg
 
Top