• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

USAF December 1950

oose

Active Member
Hi all,

Thought you might like to see these..."WHAT WE WANT IS RESULTS NOT EXCUSES" I'm sure I've heard my wife say something similar ;)






















life for a pilots family



yours stu
 

cmk-2

Member
LOVE the A-2 in 1950 and with the U.A.S.F. not U.S.A.A.F decal. You think it's a Perry with the collar points? Robin
 

deand

Active Member
Great finds at the LIFE gallery! Surprising that an A-2 would have a USAF decal. I wonder if it was a depot mod, scraping off the "Army Air Forces" and taking the lettering off the base of a helmet decal. Or a complete re-do.








dean
 

watchmanjimg

Well-Known Member
deand said:
Great finds at the LIFE gallery! Surprising that an A-2 would have a USAF decal. I wonder if it was a depot mod, scraping off the "Army Air Forces" and taking the lettering off the base of a helmet decal. Or a complete re-do.








dean

Dean:

There were ready-made decals of this type, as seen on early nylon jackets all the way into the first few sage-green models. I believe at least one forum member has an A-2 with post-WW2 USAF markings including the decal. In any event jackets of this type are fascinating examples of an Air Force in transition. I'd love to have one!
 

deand

Active Member
Were those water applied decals on the early nylon :? ? The repros use the heat transfer, don't they?






dean
 

watchmanjimg

Well-Known Member
I believe heat transfers were used on the nylon jackets. I was referring more to the configuration (winged star logo with "US Air Force" underneath).
 

deand

Active Member
watchmanjimg said:
I believe heat transfers were used on the nylon jackets. I was referring more to the configuration (winged star logo with "US Air Force" underneath).


I guess I was thinking a form of silk screening, thinking heat transfer was a later developement. It surprises me that decals were ever used on leather, even during WWII. They could not have been very resilient and would have soon looked a mess. Pictures I've seen of some show how badly they held up.



dean
 

Peter Graham

Well-Known Member
deand said:
They could not have been very resilient and would have soon looked a mess. Pictures I've seen of some show how badly they held up.
Dean, a lot have lasted really well. Here's an example of an original decal from a D-1 I used to own.


d1004.jpg
 

deand

Active Member
Peter Graham said:
deand said:
They could not have been very resilient and would have soon looked a mess. Pictures I've seen of some show how badly they held up.
Dean, a lot have lasted really well. Here's an example of an original decal from a D-1 I used to own.


Indeed, it does look pretty good for wear. The application process must have figured into it, to some degree. I believe I read somewhere about the use of turpentine was involved, something about its ability to soften up the decal for better adhesion.



dean
 

greyhound52

New Member
Dean,
I have two A2s with the USAF decal on clearly indicating they were used post 1947. One used during the Korean war with a Korean War blood chit on the back. This is my Aero. The other is a Doniger (this one went through the depot) I am pretty sure the Aero did as well.
 
Top