Need Help to Identify "A2 Werber Leather Coat Co. Contract 1729"

[33-1729]

I mean, I get it - people want Shawn’s jacket to be an unknown contract jacket. They want a sequel to JC discovering an original RW 1671P. I’d like for that to be the case, I just recognize that the evidence doesn’t give us any reason to think so.

My point is . . . . it could be. But instead of trying to disprove tangible evidence work with it. For example, consider the 1934 Alaska photograph. Based upon the date and the custom insignia it could well contain a verifiable Werber 32-6225 (no survivors), 33-1729 (survivors), and 34-518P (no survivors). Post 125 shows what may be a 32-6225 based upon tangible evidence. If an eagle eyed observer can find details splitting a 33-1729 from a 34-518P in that specific photograph then that new contract information may be applied to Shawn's jacket. Maybe it's a 34-518P. Maybe something else.

 

[mulceber]

My point is . . . . it could be. But instead of trying to disprove tangible evidence work with it. For example, consider the 1934 Alaska photograph. Based upon the date and the custom insignia it could well contain a verifiable Werber 32-6225 (no survivors), 33-1729 (survivors), and 34-518P (no survivors). Post 125 shows what may be a 32-6225 based upon tangible evidence. If an eagle eyed observer can find details splitting a 33-1729 from a 34-518P in that specific photograph then that new contract information may be applied to Shawn's jacket. Maybe it's a 34-518P. Maybe something else.

VERY good point.

 

[YoungMedic]

Is there anything that indicates a spec change to pocket hardware that deviates from the original 3 ?

Why would the 33 Werber be different than the 32?

 

[YoungMedic]

So snapped pockets in 1931 existed?

Exactly

 

[mulceber]

Heck, some of the A-1s had snaps, albeit not on the pockets. If I had to guess, button pockets were a holdover from the A-1 - the AAC just added them to the A-2 without much consideration and then someone with clout complained, and out button pockets went. But that’s just a guess.

 

[YoungMedic]

Heck, some of the A-1s had snaps, albeit not on the pockets. If I had to guess, button pockets were a holdover from the A-1 - the AAC just added them to the A-2 without much consideration and then someone with clout complained, and out button pockets went. But that’s just a guess.

My theory is they made the better mousetrap with their first small offering which is why they won the next 5 contracts until their business troubles. Edit and that may be what’s pictured above. A much thinner zipper flap than the others as well

 

[2BM2K]

As for documentation we have all been down that route before.

Remember the good old days when all A2 jackets were made of horse hide because the documentation said so? It took DNA testing to prove otherwise.

There are three types of evidence which need to be considered together; documentation, photographic and the physical jacket.

I have put Shawn's jacket in the box marked "I don't know what it is but will keep it for future reference".

What is of interest to me is that the jacket appears to be a halfway house between the SAT jacket and the Werber 1729 contract. The pocket snap is the small type, the same as used for the collar. The 1729 contract and later used a larger pocket snap.

To me this suggests that this jacket predates the 1729 jacket. If the design was changed from buttons to snaps during production then the obvious thing is use the same type of snap as for the collar.

I view it as most likely that the 6225 contract was initially fitted with button flaps and at some point the design was changed to snaps.

Here is a photo of a SAT jacket with a lined pocket, similar to Shawn's jacket.

 

[2BM2K]

DOCUMENTATION.​

I have been rereading the documentation pdf and this is what I have found.

The pdf document is quite bulky so I have copied the cleared version of spec 94-4030, dated August 1932. This is posted below with the relevant bits highlighted.

The specification states that drawing 30-1415 forms part of the specification. Without this we are missing a lot of information.

The specification also states that "All button holes shall be leather faced" . There is no mention of having buttoned pocket flaps.

Conclusion: Pocket closure type details can only be found in drawing 30-1415.

Also, this document is for going forward in time; the specification is for future contracts.