• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

B-3 Neck

London Cabbie

Well-Known Member
What is considered the general correct fit for a B-3 around the neck when zipped up with collars down. Should it be fitted, snug or loose..? Thanks
8CEB191D-AB25-417E-A4AE-B6FA7B0DE16C.jpeg
 

Falcon_52

Well-Known Member
Otter has a good point! My thought is that the neck should ideally be on the looser side. The jacket was meant to be worn over a shirt and tie and potentially a flight suit as well.

Noel
 

London Cabbie

Well-Known Member
Otter has a good point! My thought is that the neck should ideally be on the looser side. The jacket was meant to be worn over a shirt and tie and potentially a flight suit as well.

Noel
Thanks, this really helps. I would have thought it would have been a bit snug to prevent cold neck, or from heat being lost. It is a bit lost on me that you would have such a thick wooly collar and still need a scarf, was this a similar thing for Irvin’s..?
 

blackrat2

Well-Known Member
I guess like A2’s every contractor made the jacket to there interpretation of the contract hence different shapes and sizes
Probably worth trying John over at GW and see if he can advise on smaller sized collars and what maker..assuming that’s what your after
I don’t know if his DVD has many B3’s on it but that might help you
Personally I would want a smaller collar for walking about in, I have no intention of using it for flying and I figure smaller in a creamy/darker sheepskin would be less likely to stand out
 

London Cabbie

Well-Known Member
I imagine they needed the collar to be clear from obstruction to head rotation, masks, and various equipment in flight. Other positions onboard may have warranted less need for head movements as you were standing up such as a gunner, hence the throat buckles and the need to stay warmer standing by an open hatch.
44B09633-1095-47D4-8AA5-AE64604E5875.jpeg
 

mulceber

Moderator
Thanks, this really helps. I would have thought it would have been a bit snug to prevent cold neck, or from heat being lost. It is a bit lost on me that you would have such a thick wooly collar and still need a scarf, was this a similar thing for Irvin’s..?

Keep in mind, the temperature inside a plane on a bombing mission was somewhere around -40. Even with all that heavy equipment they were issued, frostbite and lost fingers, toes, and noses were relatively common. Shearling was the best anyone could come up with at the time, but even it was inadequate for the weather conditions they were facing. I imagine crew members were wearing every layer they could cram under that B-3, definitely including scarves.
 

London Cabbie

Well-Known Member
Keep in mind, the temperature inside a plane on a bombing mission was somewhere around -40. Even with all that heavy equipment they were issued, frostbite and lost fingers, toes, and noses were relatively common. Shearling was the best anyone could come up with at the time, but even it was inadequate for the weather conditions they were facing. I imagine crew members were wearing every layer they could cram under that B-3, definitely including scarves.
Makes total senseof course they would. Thanks Jan.
 

Chandler

Well-Known Member
Keep in mind, the temperature inside a plane on a bombing mission was somewhere around -40. Even with all that heavy equipment they were issued, frostbite and lost fingers, toes, and noses were relatively common. Shearling was the best anyone could come up with at the time, but even it was inadequate for the weather conditions they were facing. I imagine crew members were wearing every layer they could cram under that B-3, definitely including scarves.
Not to mention the electric heated suit (not sure when that system was first used in bombers).
 

B-Man2

Well-Known Member
If the collar fit too closely neck abrasion would be a real PIA . Pilots, gunners and most of the air crew had to have their heads on a swivel looking around for enemy aircraft. In a matter of a few hours the jackets would be unbearable without a silk scarf to protect the neck area . Much the same with the fighter pilots . So B-3 collars had some space between the collar and neck skin .
 

bfd70

Well-Known Member
I imagine they needed the collar to be clear from obstruction to head rotation, masks, and various equipment in flight. Other positions onboard may have warranted less need for head movements as you were standing up such as a gunner, hence the throat buckles and the need to stay warmer standing by an open hatch.
View attachment 71812
How loud did that have to be!
 

Otter

Well-Known Member
I had the pleasure if going through Kermit Weeks B17 and that waist gunner position is way tighter than it looks in the photos. Imagine it with a 150mph slipstream coming through the hatch.
 

Chandler

Well-Known Member
If the collar fit too closely neck abrasion would be a real PIA . Pilots, gunners and most of the air crew had to have their heads on a swivel looking around for enemy aircraft. In a matter of a few hours the jackets would be unbearable without a silk scarf to protect the neck area . Much the same with the fighter pilots . So B-3 collars had some space between the collar and neck skin .
Not to make waves, but wasn't it always the story that the Navy put mouton collars on their jackets to save pilots from neck burn? Or was that another Avirex-Cockpit myth?
 

B-Man2

Well-Known Member
Not to make waves, but wasn't it always the story that the Navy put mouton collars on their jackets to save pilots from neck burn? Or was that another Avirex-Cockpit myth?
I’m pretty sure that Shearling and Mouton are processed differently. Mouton is lamb skin and softer than shearling. Shearling is sheepskin and courser than Mouton .
I’ve worn both types of collars and the Mouton Navy collars are more tolerable to wear and don’t chaff as much as shearling collars .
 
Last edited:
Top