pipvh said:The tail gunner being "suddenly imperiled" is something of an understatement under the circumstances... :shock:
navvet said:The information in the ad was pure truth. That it was published during wartime may be reason to label it "propaganda", however it also helped keep the morale up in a situation that few Americans desired to continue(they would have preferred peace to war). Taking pride in well built products may seem a bit vain, but the circumstances justified the publicity.
JACKET_ HEAD said:I've often wondered how much damage was done to bombers flying in the box formation that was incurred by other USAAF planes. I'm sure that being sprayed with .50 cals would be very unlikely to down a plane but how many of the bullet holes in those planes were done by their own side ?
Dave
JACKET_ HEAD said:I've often wondered how much damage was done to bombers flying in the box formation that was incurred by other USAAF planes. I'm sure that being sprayed with .50 cals would be very unlikely to down a plane but how many of the bullet holes in those planes were done by their own side ?
Dave