eBay
Hamsterbear Member Jun 18, 2011 #2 Original Perry..... ..probably worn by a guy who flew the "Hump" in the CBI. Historical in that regard, hardly a "Flying Tiger" jacket.
Original Perry..... ..probably worn by a guy who flew the "Hump" in the CBI. Historical in that regard, hardly a "Flying Tiger" jacket.
D dmar836 Well-Known Member Jun 18, 2011 #3 Does he really think 0233 is the owner's SN? It is a cool jacket but the name tag must be illegible so effectively it may not be named at all. A friend once had a similar CBI A-2. You could see a grimy spot where his holster rubbed against the added US flag pocket. Cool stuff.
Does he really think 0233 is the owner's SN? It is a cool jacket but the name tag must be illegible so effectively it may not be named at all. A friend once had a similar CBI A-2. You could see a grimy spot where his holster rubbed against the added US flag pocket. Cool stuff.
R RCSignals Active Member Jun 18, 2011 #4 Is he correct about the chit? How 'early' is it, AVG? I guess he thinks the chit number can be researched to who it was issued to, not necessarily that it is a service number.
Is he correct about the chit? How 'early' is it, AVG? I guess he thinks the chit number can be researched to who it was issued to, not necessarily that it is a service number.