• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Another "Flying Tigers" A-2 FS

Stony

Well-Known Member
Looks real, but it's a 14th AF jacket not "Flying Tigers".

It is a very common mistake that people mistake the 14th AF for the Flying Tigers. I was assigned to the 23rd Fighter Wing when I was in the Air Force in the early 70s. However, I was not a "Flying Tiger", but our motif was very much like the patch on the chest of this A-2.
 

TankBuster

Active Member
unclegrumpy said:
Looks real, but it's a 14th AF jacket not "Flying Tigers".

Exactly. It's just a 14th AAF chest size patch. They were fairly common in the CBI especially with cargo and hump pilots.
 

Silver Surfer

Well-Known Member
the big head, sometimes red painted tiger, always facing left, is believed to be of the air commandos, 14th af. these are usually early war patches, about or prior to 1942. the jac looks like a dubow. i have a 1941-42 [first contract without the collar stand] that has a version of the big headed tiger, painted red, on it. its curious though, that the size of the patch on the jacket being offered is somewhat small, possibly made for a shoulder patch. the few [perhaps a total of 4] that i have seen [mine included] are in the 5" diameter range. anyhoo, the jac looks legit.
 

Persimmon

Well-Known Member
Roughwear said:
Yes its a Dubow from the 27798 contract that was issued in 1942. I agree it's a 14th AF jacket.

The person selling it is well...actually not the person selling it.

Its being put on by a friend of the owner and this was the information the "seller" was given about the jackets history by another friend.
 

Roughwear

Well-Known Member
Persimmon said:
Roughwear said:
Yes its a Dubow from the 27798 contract that was issued in 1942. I agree it's a 14th AF jacket.

The person selling it is well...actually not the person selling it.

Its being put on by a friend of the owner and this was the information the "seller" was given about the jackets history by another friend.


We the info in the listing is misleading then as it says:
This was given to me by a neighbor in 1977 In Houston ,Texas when I was a kid and I have had it all these years I have lovingly taken care of it using proper leather conditioners etc to keep it in great shape.
:eek:
 

Roughwear

Well-Known Member
I think it looks honest too Tim. Perhaps Alan can explain why he says the person selling it is not the owner of the jacket?
 

Stony

Well-Known Member
I received a reply from the seller and he posted what information the owner of the jacket gave him. He was glad to know exactly what type of jacket is was, and from his tone, seems like he'll probably change the wording.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
unclegrumpy said:
Looks real, but it's a 14th AF jacket not "Flying Tigers".
From what I understand Chennault used the name Flying Tigers in the fourteenth AAF, yes the AVG were the original Flying Tigers, but maybe I'm wrong.
 

RCSignals

Active Member
Didn't that usage just happen through lineage? Is there not a unit that still calls itself 'Flying Tigers' through decendance?
 

shedonwanna

Active Member
RCSignals said:
Didn't that usage just happen through lineage? Is there not a unit that still calls itself 'Flying Tigers' through decendance?

The only unit given direct permission from the AVG Flying Tigers to officially use "Flying Tigers" is the 229th Aviation Regiment. They have even adopted the AVG squadron insignia and hold the AVG in high regards.

Quote from their web site:
In 1988, the 229th Aviation Regiment (ATTACK) was granted permission from the American Volunteer Group (FLYING TIGERS) to use their name and logo. All units within the 229th Aviation Regiment are proudly known as the Flying Tigers. Just like their early World War Two brethren, the modern day Flying Tigers are prepared to go anywhere in the world and confront overwhelming odds to maintain democracy and peace to oppressed people.
 
Top