• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Was there an A-9 Flight Jacket?

watchmanjimg

Well-Known Member
I'm not terribly versed in WW2 cloth flying gear, but I think the "A" prefix was exclusive to trousers by the time these items were produced. Pretty sure the nomenclature of the corresponding parkas began with a "B," as did the intermediate jackets like the B-10 and B-15.
 

CBI

Well-Known Member
yes, I guess I did see the pics in the American Flight Jackets book but it looks like the B-10 on the page next to it (both in a darker green). The A-9 has stitched eps but I was thinking someone might have field mod'ed it that way. I sure wish there was a pic of a label. Yes, a great price. Maybe we can look at it as a dark green B-10 (as some seemed to have existed) and call it a day.
 

CBI

Well-Known Member
any more ideas anyone? if this forum group doesn't know, I guess no one else will??????
 

CBI

Well-Known Member
there is reference to an A-9 jacket on page 38 of Maguire's "American Flight Jackets" book. 2 photos of the same jacket, a very dark green B-10 looking jacket. Photo captions:

"Detail showing the very dark OD cotton material and stitched on epaulet of the type A-9 jacket"

and

"The AAF issue type A-9 jacket was apparently a predecessor of the B-10 jacket but little is known about it"
 

a2jacketpatches

Active Member
Picture says a thousand words but in this case a simple snapshot of the label with just a few words would beat it. I hear there's a lot of flaws in these books and this could be one of them. To omit the label with such little known of the jacket is odd IMO.
 

CBI

Well-Known Member
could very well be a civi jacket or just a darker B-10 with the field mod eps. I know any sort of OD clothing item in WW2 saw many shade variations. Sometimes, quite significant.
 

watchmanjimg

Well-Known Member
a2jacketpatches said:
Picture says a thousand words but in this case a simple snapshot of the label with just a few words would beat it. I hear there's a lot of flaws in these books and this could be one of them. To omit the label with such little known of the jacket is odd IMO.

I agree. I'm beginning to wonder if the sole inspiration for the repro was the example in the Maguire book. Here's a link to what is stated as a repro A-9 but whose label actually reads . . . B-10:

http://centrohistoricooverlord.com.br/s ... -wwii-a-9/

I must say that I find the absence of any pictures of the purported A-9's label highly suspect as this would be the most conclusive proof of its existence as such.
 
Top